
That's pretty good, actually.
The two heavyweights for scientific graphing that I'm familiar with are SigmaPlot.
With its unrivaled chart selection and easy chart customization capabilities you will find DeltaGraph the most comprehensive charting application available for Windows and Mac. Deltagraph runs 300 (200 for an academic license). Work smarter with custom chart template libraries, MS.
#Deltagraph mac#
Pros: Works with big numbers and datasets, plays well with Excel data, has lots of flexibility on axis labeling and tick marks, makes just about any kind of chartĬons: You need a separate design program to make the charts publication-ready, exports some cumbersome paths along with the chart that need to be removed, some functions are hard to figure out at first. DeltaGraph for Windows and Mac combines powerful statistical tools with stunning data visualization capabilities to give your data audience appeal. DeltaGraph provides unparalleled chart selection, data analysis and graph customization capabilities.

xls files, sometimes chokes on big datasets or long numbers, few options for the tick marks and won’t read numbers as the category axis. The charts are clean without a bunch of compound paths or other junk that needs to be deleted.Ĭons: Will not import. DeltaGraph combines powerful statistical tools with stunning data visualization capabilities to give your data audience appeal. Pros: It’s fast and easy to use, you can do the plotting of the chart and the aesthetic details all in one program. I prefer Deltagraph for step charts and complex fever charts. I prefer the Illustrator charting tool for bars, pies, sized circles and simple lines.

This is a pretty arcane topic, but I’ve chewed this over enough with colleagues (nobody agrees) that I sense it might interest at least a few visual journalists.
